- From: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
- Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 21:43:31 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, David Singer <singer@apple.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Sep 7, 2010, at 8:15 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 7:59 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >> And you'd rather use a comma than "to"? I think it's clearer to use "to" >> since we're separating the colors with commas. > > I prefer commas because it's more consistent, and it's how nearly > every programming language does functions, particularly javascript. > >> While we're at it, the use of a comma to separate the geometry from the >> colors also bothers me for the same reason. >> >> How about >> linear-gradient(<position> [to <position>]? as <color>, <color>, ...) >> ? > > That seems even worse to me. ^_^ > >> If the problem is DOM access, why not define different interfaces for >> them (LinearBoxGradient and LinearAngleGradient), but leave the parsed >> syntax the same? > > That's smfr's call. What do you think, Simon? Would that be sufficient? It doesn't help with interpolation for animation. Simon
Received on Wednesday, 8 September 2010 04:44:07 UTC