- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 17:41:02 -0700
- To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Sep 7, 2010, at 12:41 , Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 12:33 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >> Why aren't we using the grammar at the bottom of >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Aug/0232.html >> ? I think that's much more straightforward. > > Except for using a comma instead of "to", that's what I'm looking at > right now. We just want to split the angle case out into a separate > function, and need a name for it. I think I'll just use > angle-gradient() until someone gives me something better. I thought I had. You can't contrast radial-gradient with angle-gradient, because the latter is actually a linear-gradient. And having a third called linear-gradient would be even more confusing. Which is why I suggested radial-gradient linear-box-gradient linear-angle-gradient wordy as they are. David Singer Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Wednesday, 8 September 2010 00:41:35 UTC