W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2010

Re: [CSS4] box-shadow and box-shadow inset

From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 09:31:21 -0700
Cc: Masataka Yakura <myakura.web@gmail.com>, CSS 3 W3C Group <www-style@w3.org>
Message-Id: <264E820A-EEA6-4628-92BE-3AC12C69DE92@gmail.com>
To: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>

On Sep 1, 2010, at 5:57 AM, Alan Gresley wrote:

> Masataka Yakura wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com> wrote:
>>> After reading the 'Minutes and Resolutions Oslo F2F 2010' I still do not
>>> like the current proposal. I believe that CSS4 Backgrounds and Border should
>>> be moved to CR and that box-shadow should be shipped without vendor
>>> prefixes.
>>> 
>>> My question is how does one apply a box-shadow and box-shadow inset on the
>>> same element? The following just doesn't work.
>>> 
>>> div {
>>> width: 100px;
>>> height: 100px;
>>> box-shadow: inset 5px 5px 10px black;
>>> box-shadow: 5px 5px 10px black;
>>> 
>>> 
>>> <div>A box situated in Seattle</div>
>> box-shadow can take a comma-separated list of shadows so the following
>> should work:
>>  box-shadow: inset 5px 5px 10px black, 5px 5px 10px black;
> 
> Well I have been out of the loop. Ok, this is good, very good. I see that this works fine apart from the issue with scrolling in overflow with box-shadow inset behaving like background-attachment: fixed (mentioned by Brad Kemper). Can the module be moved to CR so we can drop vendor prefixes. Please.

Yes, that was the resolution:

>  RESOLVED: publish as CR
Received on Wednesday, 1 September 2010 16:32:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:31 GMT