- From: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
- Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 07:59:13 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>, "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
On Oct 30, 2010, at 5:05 am, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Sylvain Galineau > <sylvaing@microsoft.com> wrote: >>> From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com] >>> I'm not sure, but I think I'd expect the fixpos to not transform at >>> all, precisely because it's fixed. Absposes would still transform, >>> because they're guaranteed to have a containing block equal to or >>> within the transformed element. >> >> So what you expect is that fixed positioned elements transform only when >> the transform is applied to them. Correct ? >> >> I don't find that unreasonable given the semantics of position:fixed. >> Curious about what others think ? > > Right. Agreed; it's perfectly reasonable for a fixedpos element to transform, and WebKit does this. The only area of disagreement is about whether a transformed element acts as a container for fixedpos elements. I'll talk to Dave Hyatt about why we wrote the spec that way originally. Simon
Received on Saturday, 30 October 2010 15:00:35 UTC