- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 00:13:35 +0000
- To: "shelby@coolpage.com" <shelby@coolpage.com>, "Håkon Wium Lie" <howcome@opera.com>
- CC: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
> From: www-style-request@w3.org [mailto:www-style-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of Shelby Moore > > So in my and I think the designer's mind, the correct result is: > > Inline overflow: > baz-----------------------> > foo | foo | foo | bar | qux > > Block overflow: > baz-------------> > foo | foo | foo | > bar | qux > > Now isn't that a lot more sane and consist? I sure don't know since I can't tell what your answer is. I see two different renderings ? I'll assume, however, that in both cases you layout baz on top of all the columns. How and why does is that correct per the designer's mind ? Why would he expect all the other elements to flow in source order except that one ? > > Note it is incorrect to assume baz is centered, > that is why I drew it > as I > did on the left side with an arrow showing its extent. Uh ? The element's style attribute says text-align:center. How do we ignore properties explicitly specified by the designer and claim the result aligns with his expectations ?
Received on Wednesday, 27 October 2010 00:14:07 UTC