W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2010

Re: [css3-transitions] How mismatched transition-* value lengths are resolved

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 14:24:10 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=JkxBT+ye=p=azzcPfEFs3Tb9j+jtCph2GHzsY@mail.gmail.com>
To: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
Cc: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, Chris Marrin <cmarrin@apple.com>
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote:
> On Oct 22, 2010, at 4:28 PM, Sylvain Galineau wrote:
>> Given that duplicate properties are handled on
>> a last-one-wins basis, repeating the transition-property list itself seems
>> less
>> desirable and more prone to causing unwelcome surprises.
> I'm not sure what you mean by "repeating the transition-property list
> itself".

He means, given CSS like "transition-property: color,
background-color; transition-duration: 1s 2s 3s;", cycling
transition-property to match the length of the duration list,
obtaining a result identical to "transition-property: color,
background-color, color; transition-duration: 1s 2s 3s;".

Received on Monday, 25 October 2010 21:25:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:40 UTC