W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2010

RE: [css3-3d-transforms] perspective-origin and percentages

From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 03:35:52 +0000
To: Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
CC: "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <045A765940533D4CA4933A4A7E32597E2805C843@TK5EX14MBXC111.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
> From: www-style-request@w3.org [mailto:www-style-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of Øyvind Stenhaug
> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 5:52 AM
> To: Simon Fraser
> Cc: www-style@w3.org list
> Subject: Re: [css3-3d-transforms] perspective-origin and percentages
> 
> > On Oct 12, 2010, at 5:32 pm, Sylvain Galineau wrote:
> 
> >> For percentages, the perspective-origin property definition [1]
> >> resolves percentages as:
> >>
> >> 	# refer to the size of the box itself
> >>
> >> I assume this is identical to transform-origin in 2D Transforms [2]:
> >>
> >> 	# refer to the size of the element's box
> 
> On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 04:43:44 +0200, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote:
> 
> > That's correct. I'll fix the spec.
> 
> Even the definition 2D Transforms spec incorrectly assumes that there's
> just one box per element.
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Sep/0121.html

> 
> --
> Øyvind Stenhaug
> Core Norway, Opera Software ASA
> 

True. Also not sure 'size' is appropriate here. Does it mean the Y position
percentage refers to the element's height while the X position refers to the
element width ? Or that both refer to width ?

Received on Thursday, 14 October 2010 03:36:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:32 GMT