- From: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:37:55 -0700
- To: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
The spec doesn't say that the arguments to scale() have to be positive, and it's standard graphics behavior for negative scales to flip, so I think it's implied already. I'd be fine making it more explicitly allowed. Simon On Oct 12, 2010, at 3:13 PM, Sylvain Galineau wrote: > To conclude on this: this is going to be allowed by the spec, yes ? > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Sylvain Galineau >> Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 5:43 PM >> To: www-style@w3.org list >> Subject: [css3-2d-transforms][css3-3d-transforms] Handling of negative >> scaling vectors is not specified >> >> It seems WebKit and Firefox accept negative scaling vectors; both >> generate a reflected version of the content but with some differences. >> >> It'd be great to specify the desired behavior. I haven't yet thought >> through the options but would appreciate more details on current >> implementations. >> >> >> >
Received on Tuesday, 12 October 2010 23:38:33 UTC