W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2010

Re: [css3-2d-transforms][css3-3d-transforms] Handling of negative scaling vectors is not specified

From: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:37:55 -0700
Cc: "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-id: <3928506D-A688-475F-85C7-B2A4DC54D83F@me.com>
To: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
The spec doesn't say that the arguments to scale() have to be positive, and it's standard graphics behavior for negative scales to flip, so I think it's implied already. I'd be fine making it more explicitly allowed.


On Oct 12, 2010, at 3:13 PM, Sylvain Galineau wrote:

> To conclude on this: this is going to be allowed by the spec, yes ?
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sylvain Galineau
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 5:43 PM
>> To: www-style@w3.org list
>> Subject: [css3-2d-transforms][css3-3d-transforms] Handling of negative
>> scaling vectors is not specified
>> It seems WebKit and Firefox accept negative scaling vectors; both
>> generate a reflected version of the content but with some differences.
>> It'd be great to specify the desired behavior. I haven't yet thought
>> through the options but would appreciate more details on current
>> implementations.
Received on Tuesday, 12 October 2010 23:38:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:39 UTC