Re: [css3-images] Color as an image type

On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 8:03 PM, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 23, 2010, 11:13:50 PM, fantasai wrote:
>
> f> I don't think there's adequate justification for making <color> a subset
> f> of <image. It complicates our parsing requirements and gives more people
> f> a reason to confuse 2D images with 0D colors.
>
> For extra points, we could debate the intrinsic dimensions of "red".

That point, at least, was covered by my above proposal - "red" as an
<image> would have no intrinsic dimensions.  ^_^

~TJ

Received on Wednesday, 24 November 2010 19:23:50 UTC