W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2010

Re: [css3-images] Color as an image type

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 11:22:56 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTikWvmNjdp-S_BC7LMoD3z2-5JkArjTzS2JzUnKC@mail.gmail.com>
To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 8:03 PM, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 23, 2010, 11:13:50 PM, fantasai wrote:
>
> f> I don't think there's adequate justification for making <color> a subset
> f> of <image. It complicates our parsing requirements and gives more people
> f> a reason to confuse 2D images with 0D colors.
>
> For extra points, we could debate the intrinsic dimensions of "red".

That point, at least, was covered by my above proposal - "red" as an
<image> would have no intrinsic dimensions.  ^_^

~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 24 November 2010 19:23:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:34 GMT