W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2010

RE: [css3-content] [css21-content] Syntax for adding alternative text for inserted image

From: Belov, Charles <Charles.Belov@sfmta.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 10:22:19 -0800
Message-ID: <E17F75B6E86AE842A57B4534F82D03769C32F8@MTAMAIL.muni.sfgov.org>
To: "www-style list" <www-style@w3.org>
Cc: "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Boris Zbarsky [mailto:bzbarsky@MIT.EDU] wrote on Friday, November 19,
2010 5:25 AM
> On 11/19/10 3:41 AM, Belov, Charles wrote:
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-content/#inserting3
> > and
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/generate.html#content
> > would be improved by an example as to how to add an alt 
> attribute with 
> > a text value, for example "New!" onto the image brought in 
> by the uri.
> 
> Uh...  If you need to add alt text, then the image has 
> semantic meaning; it's not just a decoration.
> 
> If it has semantic meaning, then adding it via CSS is just 
> wrong. In particular, it'll break badly in a UA that just 
> doesn't load your CSS.
> 
> So there is no way to the alt text, because if you need to do 
> it, you're misusing the feature badly.

I'm puzzled here.  The syntax also allows for adding strings, which
could also be semantic (although presumably not causing problems for
screen readers unless it also was ignored by the user agent).  Are you
saying that only meaningless strings such as " " or "*#*#*#*" belong in
a content property?  (A string of "*" of course becomes semantic if used
to mark required fields or otherwise marks certain items as having a
certain property.)

Or perhaps we could think of it more like an independent clause, which
if missing does not change the meaning of a sentence but if present
enriches understanding of the sentence.

Hope this helps,
Charles Belov
SFMTA Webmaster
Received on Friday, 19 November 2010 18:26:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:34 GMT