W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2010

Re: [css3-background] New use case for background-position-x (&y!)

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 12:07:35 +0100
To: "Brad Kemper" <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, "Lee Kowalkowski" <lee.kowalkowski@googlemail.com>
Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.vlz6iwc364w2qv@anne-van-kesterens-macbook-pro.local>
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 11:59:45 +0100, Lee Kowalkowski  
<lee.kowalkowski@googlemail.com> wrote:
> All instances of the shorthand properties that lack the individual
> properties ought to have started out as separate properties, and
> optimised afterwards.  Then you would have identified and resolved any
> interaction issues with other properties up front.

I do not really agree with this, but given that both Safari/Chrome and IE  
have background-position-x and background-position-y I think we should add  

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Thursday, 11 November 2010 11:08:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:40 UTC