W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2010

Re: [css3-2d-transforms] Should a transformed element reflow its content ?

From: Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 17:35:26 +0100
To: "Sylvain Galineau" <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.vllsdcalbunlto@oyvinds-desktop>
On Wed, 03 Nov 2010 16:54:31 +0100, Sylvain Galineau  
<sylvaing@microsoft.com> wrote:

> I stand correct on overflow:scroll. My bad.
>
> But why would it be any different with overflow:auto ? To oversimplify,
> my expectation is that transforms are applied to the laid-out element
> before it's painted. So if the element does not cause overflow before
> transform, I expect it to look the same after transform whether or not
> the transform is causing the parent to overflow.

Hm, OK, auto gets a bit weird. Actually, something quite similar happens  
with position: relative (in Chrome, Firefox, IE and Opera).

More spec detail would definitely be good.

-- 
Øyvind Stenhaug
Core Norway, Opera Software ASA
Received on Wednesday, 3 November 2010 16:34:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:34 GMT