W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2010

Re: [flex-units] unit abbreviations and the flex()

From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 13:58:01 -0700
Message-Id: <39A941FD-A84C-43E5-92D7-D3A2113C7E61@gmail.com>
To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Cc: Zack Weinberg <zweinberg@mozilla.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
DOH! Of course margin CAN. Be less than zero. What was I thinking? Sigh.

On May 28, 2010, at 1:33 PM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On May 28, 2010, at 11:12 AM, Zack Weinberg <zweinberg@mozilla.com>  
> wrote:
>
>> Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> No, I agree. But that's why I mentioned 'margin: calc(1fl + 2px)',
>>> which would be a 2px hard lower boundary, supposing that '1fl' might
>>> typically be much more than that, but capping it at 2px in case it
>>> wasn't.
>>
>> Wait, what?  Weren't you just arguing for '1fl' to be allowed to be
>> negative?
>
> Yes, but margin can't be less than zero. I guess I was thinking  
> margin would hit zero, not go any lower, and then the 2px would be  
> added back, but you're right, that doesn't really make mathmatical  
> sense.
Received on Friday, 28 May 2010 20:58:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:27 GMT