W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2010

Re: Additive vs absolute flexes

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 06:40:56 +1200
Message-ID: <AANLkTikStugSaBLHuCKq3ouR43JKHWUpirpD9PkbxprA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: www-style <www-style@w3.org>, sylvain.spinelli@kelis.fr
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 5:12 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>wrote:

> As well, this brings up an interesting possibility for what 'auto'
> width/height should compute to.  Right now it computes to "1fl" as
> long as the box isn't otherwise flexing in that axis.  Perhaps we
> should have it compute to "calc(fit-content + 1fl)" instead? (That is,
> have it act like the additive flex defined in the current module.)

In Gecko (and I think Webkit) flex is zero by default.

"He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities;
the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are
healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his
own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all." [Isaiah
Received on Tuesday, 18 May 2010 18:41:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:35 UTC