W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2010

RE: Selectors, vendor prefixes (again...) and IE9

From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 15:22:52 +0000
To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>, "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>
CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <045A765940533D4CA4933A4A7E32597E2148CB89@TK5EX14MBXC120.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
> From: Daniel Glazman [mailto:daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com]
> Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2010 8:01 AM
> To: Anne van Kesteren
> Cc: Sylvain Galineau; www-style@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Selectors, vendor prefixes (again...) and IE9
> 
> Le 16/05/10 10:12, Anne van Kesteren a écrit :
> 
> > On Sun, 16 May 2010 00:22:33 +0200, Sylvain Galineau
> > <sylvaing@microsoft.com> wrote:
> >> But now, you are implicitly asking for this:
> >>
> >> #foo::-moz-selection,
> >> #foo::-ms-selection,
> >> #foo::-webkit-selection,
> >> #foo::-o-selection,
> >> #foo::selection {
> >> ....
> >> }
> >
> > FWIW: this would never work. You need a separate rule set for each of
> them.
> 
> Right. Non implemented pseudos trash the whole group of selectors.

Yikes. My bad. Well then it's even worse than I thought.
Received on Sunday, 16 May 2010 15:23:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:27 GMT