W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2010

Re: Fw: RE: [css-flexbox] Summary of planned changes to Flexbox Module

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 12:17:55 +1200
Message-ID: <AANLkTilrgq5wtsVtmbVlR-yqYAhiRnzrJ__21sJta21C@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>, Adam Del Vecchio <adam.delvecchio@go-techo.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>wrote:

> That's actually a spec change. And you still have an equivalent problem
> when you collapse 20px with 2fl, as it turns out. At least some set of cases
> reduce to the problem of solving for F an equation of the form
>    sum_over_i( max(m_i, k_i F) ) = N
> It's piecewise-linear, but increasing and continuous in F

Well, assuming we don't allow negative flex values. I certainly hope that's

"He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities;
the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are
healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his
own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all." [Isaiah
Received on Wednesday, 12 May 2010 00:18:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:35 UTC