W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2010

Re: [css3-content] "content" property, replaced elements, and width

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 10:29:08 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTinylQ6njbcIrmalPOhFsHGw7Dp8Mq-ZHU8g8UTN@mail.gmail.com>
To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Daniel Glazman
<daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> wrote:
> Le 10/05/10 18:03, Tab Atkins Jr. a écrit :
>> <img>  is a null element in HTML, and *can't* have children in the markup.
>>  ^_^
> I never said I find it clever to preserve the emptyness of <img> and the
> old HTML 2.0 model of the element.
> Tab, I honestly don't care if 'content' works as said in CSS3... We can
> have our own non-empty image tag anyway with a fallback mechanism for
> images that is simpler than <object>.

So, I'm not quite sure what you're aiming at at this point, then.  Do
you have something to say on the thread?  Would you mind refocusing if
you do?

Received on Monday, 10 May 2010 17:30:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 11 February 2015 12:34:36 UTC