- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 08:53:51 -0700
- To: Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org>
- Cc: Adam Del Vecchio <adam.delvecchio@go-techo.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org> wrote: > On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> display-inside: flexbox >> flexbox-order: <integer> (1) >> flexbox-wrap: wrap | nowrap (nowrap) >> flexbox-break-before: always | avoid | auto (auto) >> flexbox-break-after: always | avoid | auto (auto) >> flexbox-begin: [ [[top | bottom] && [left | right]] | [[start | end] >> && [before | after]] ] (start before) > > In the interests of brevity, can we s/flexbox/flex? The "box" part is pretty > clearly implied. > > display-inside: flex > flex-order: <integer> (1) > flex-wrap: wrap | nowrap (nowrap) > flex-break-before: always | avoid | auto (auto) > flex-break-after: always | avoid | auto (auto) > flex-begin: [ [[top | bottom] && [left | right]] | [[start | end] && [before | after]] ] (start before) I don't have any particular problem with that. ~TJ
Received on Monday, 10 May 2010 15:54:47 UTC