W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2010

Re: Fw: RE: [css-flexbox] Summary of planned changes to Flexbox Module

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 08:53:51 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTim7IDj5lhm2LOFzVPStL8Hu0EDXJqVVk0I1yoCT@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org>
Cc: Adam Del Vecchio <adam.delvecchio@go-techo.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org> wrote:
> On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> display-inside: flexbox
>> flexbox-order: <integer> (1)
>> flexbox-wrap: wrap | nowrap (nowrap)
>> flexbox-break-before: always | avoid | auto (auto)
>> flexbox-break-after: always | avoid | auto (auto)
>> flexbox-begin: [ [[top | bottom] && [left | right]] | [[start | end]
>> && [before | after]] ] (start before)
>
> In the interests of brevity, can we s/flexbox/flex? The "box" part is pretty
> clearly implied.
>
> display-inside: flex
> flex-order: <integer> (1)
> flex-wrap: wrap | nowrap (nowrap)
> flex-break-before: always | avoid | auto (auto)
> flex-break-after: always | avoid | auto (auto)
> flex-begin: [ [[top | bottom] && [left | right]] | [[start | end] && [before | after]] ] (start before)

I don't have any particular problem with that.

~TJ
Received on Monday, 10 May 2010 15:54:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:27 GMT