W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2010

Re: [css3-content] "content" property, replaced elements, and width

From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 16:54:11 +0200
Message-ID: <4BE81E13.2040008@disruptive-innovations.com>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Cc: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Le 08/05/10 11:52, Anne van Kesteren a écrit :

> On Sun, 09 May 2010 01:05:07 +1000, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
> wrote:
>> That is, with this
>> extension, an image element is just displayed using the rule:
>> img { content: attr(src, url); }
> I used to think this was a pretty neat abstraction, but now I know more
> of how <img> interacts with the DOM in terms of events and state exposed
> on the HTMLImageElement object I wonder whether it is still useful to
> think of <img> being implemented in the above way. I.e. if the HTML just
> says

Yes, it is still useful. Big Corporate sites __need__ this.

Received on Monday, 10 May 2010 14:54:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:34 UTC