W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2010

Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-04-21

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Sun, 09 May 2010 21:10:41 -0400
Message-ID: <4BE75D11.6060704@mit.edu>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 5/9/10 12:59 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> Ah, no, I was certainly going to define the auto-offset behavior.
> Luckily we have much less interop on that, so it's not so much a big
> deal to redefine.  I was planning on it being the first of the
> following that exists:
> * the top-left corner of the border box of the following table-cell
> * 1px to the right of the top-right corner of the border box of the
> preceding table-cell

I'm not sure this does the "right thing" (or at least something that 
would make sense for auto offsets) for rowspanning cells, depending on 
how you're defining "preceding" and "following" (those do need to be 

The "1px to the right" thing doesn't make sense.  You'll end up with 
gaps that way, no?  Unless you don't mean CSS px?  Or unless you're 
defining "corner" in some way that doesn't quite jump out at me, or both.

Received on Monday, 10 May 2010 01:11:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:34 UTC