W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2010

Re: Are CSS animations a done deal?

From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 20:31:29 -0700
Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, www-style@w3.org, Lars Gunther <gunther@keryx.se>
Message-Id: <D9D23D9C-D723-4C3A-80CC-3BF1D39D19C7@gmail.com>
To: robert@ocallahan.org

On Mar 29, 2010, at 8:20 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote:
> Why is that, if the end result is the same? Why not let the authors choose whatever means makes the most sense to them?
> 
> Obviously we're not going to "stop" authors from doing anything.
> 
> We are allowed to make recommendations, such as recommending that authors use CSS instead of the <font> element.

That seems like a reasonable approach. 

> Flash-ad-style animations shouldn't be in CSS, since the animation is an essential part of the content.


Agreed.


Received on Tuesday, 30 March 2010 03:32:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:25 GMT