W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2010

Re: Are CSS animations a done deal?

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:43:40 +1300
Message-ID: <11e306601003291843s3b146464y1d4e184e0d34bc19@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Cc: www-style@w3.org, Lars Gunther <gunther@keryx.se>
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:22:18 -0700, Lars Gunther <gunther@keryx.se> wrote:
>
>> 2010-03-29 23:16, Robert O'Callahan skrev:
>>
>>> My personal opinion is that CSS Animation makes sense for presentational
>>> animations, but I don't want to see CSS Animation used for animations
>>> that are essentially animated images (like most Flash ads).
>>>
>>
>> Mark my words. That will happen!
>>
>> To many "ninjas", too many "clever" people, too much incentive!
>>
>
> Sure they will, but there's not really any disadvantage compared to them
> using some JavaScript-based solution instead.


Yeah, but I'd rather they used SVG animation or some other content-based
declarative animation instead.

Rob
-- 
"He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities;
the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are
healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his
own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all." [Isaiah
53:5-6]
Received on Tuesday, 30 March 2010 01:44:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:25 GMT