- From: Axel Dahmen <brille1@hotmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 00:23:31 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
"Brad Kemper" <brad.kemper@gmail.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:0179A3D6-333A-4642-984F-8F831E141068@gmail.com... > I kind of like it. I think it could go a bit farther, treating FRAMESET as > though it was 'display:table' and FRAME as though it was a special type of > 'display:table-cell'. Then you could allow other table properties, such as > 'border-collapse' and 'border-spacing'. 'Width' and 'height' would work > the same as with 'display:table-*' . The "flow" thing could perhaps be > dealt with via CSS 'block-progression' property. You could even use the > CSS3 "resize" to determine if the frame was resizable. None of this works > this way currently for frames. Great idea. Sounds very good to me. These properties give even more definition to the layout of frames and will yield a more equal look at different browsers. Particularly from the "border-collapse" perspective. Cheers, Axel Dahmen
Received on Friday, 26 March 2010 23:24:13 UTC