W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2010

Re: Frameset/Frame Specification Amendment (HTML+CSS)

From: Axel Dahmen <brille1@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 00:23:31 +0100
To: www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <hojfll$up0$1@dough.gmane.org>
"Brad Kemper" <brad.kemper@gmail.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag 
> I kind of like it. I think it could go a bit farther, treating FRAMESET as 
> though it was 'display:table' and FRAME as though it was a special type of 
> 'display:table-cell'. Then you could allow other table properties, such as 
> 'border-collapse' and 'border-spacing'. 'Width' and 'height' would work 
> the same as with 'display:table-*' .  The "flow" thing could perhaps be 
> dealt with via CSS 'block-progression' property. You could even use the 
> CSS3 "resize" to determine if the frame was resizable. None of this works 
> this way currently for frames.

Great idea. Sounds very good to me.

These properties give even more definition to the layout of frames and will 
yield a more equal look at different browsers. Particularly from the 
"border-collapse" perspective.

Axel Dahmen 
Received on Friday, 26 March 2010 23:24:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 11 February 2015 12:34:34 UTC