W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2010

Re: [Bulk] Re: Counter-increment is not clear in CSS21 and CSS3

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 23:59:41 -0700
Message-ID: <4BAB09DD.1010503@inkedblade.net>
To: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
CC: CSS 3 W3C Group <www-style@w3.org>
On 03/20/2009 08:55 AM, Bert Bos wrote:
> Here is a draft modification to the specification:
>
> In 12.2 "The 'content' property"[1], add this text at the end of the
> definition of<counter>:
>
>      The name must not be 'none', 'inherit' or 'initial'. Such a name
>      causes the declaration to be ignored.
>
> In 12.4 "Automatic counters and numbering"[2], insert this paragraph
> before the first example:
>
>      The keywords 'none', 'inherit' and 'initial' must not be used as
>      counter names. A value of 'none' on its own means no counters are
>      reset, resp. incremented. 'Inherit' on its own has its usual
>      meaning (see 6.2.1). 'Initial' is reserved for future use.

Shouldn't this list, like the one for font-family, reserve the keyword
'default' as well?

~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 25 March 2010 07:00:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:25 GMT