W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2010

Re: [css3-color] #rrggbbaa annotation

From: Zack Weinberg <zweinberg@mozilla.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 22:01:20 -0700
To: Alberto Lepe <dev@alepe.com>
Cc: www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <20100324220120.5d6fc779@trurl>
Alberto Lepe <dev@alepe.com> wrote:
> ... the
> feature to enable #RRGGBBAA and #RGBA annotation
> for colors was rejected because it was "too late for this version".
> 
> Many people here will agree that this is a really useful feature and I
> don't understand why is not been taken into account yet.
> We can't wait until CSS4 for this feature as most of the sites will be
> already using the RGBA or HSLA
> annotation to accomplish color transparency (by then), which will make
> the #RRGGBBAA recommendation out of time and useless in CSS4.

Why do you consider #rrggbbaa superior to rgba(rr,gg,bb,aa) ?

> I think most developers uses the HEX annotation because it is just
> simpler, shorter, cleaner and widely used in graphical applications.

In more detail, please?  My immediate reaction is that, far from
being "simpler" or "cleaner", #rrggbb is already too hard to read on
account of the absence of separators, and tacking an aa component on
the end just makes it worse; so I personally don't think #rrggbbaa
should be added to CSS at all.  (I'll grant you "shorter", but
terseness must give way to readability wherever the two are in
conflict.)

zw
Received on Thursday, 25 March 2010 05:01:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:25 GMT