W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2010

Re: transitions vs. animations

From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 00:30:55 +0100
Message-ID: <19364.2351.727045.271622@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
To: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
Cc: www-style@w3.org
Simon Fraser wrote:

 > > A better reason for having two different specs/property-sets would be
 > > if it makes sense have both on the same element. I.e., are there
 > > any use cases where you would set both a transition and an animation
 > > on the same element?
 > 
 > Yes, you could easily run a transition on one property of an
 > element while animating another, or apply an animation while an
 > element is in the middle of a long transition.

Could you show an example?

-h&kon
              Håkon Wium Lie                          CTO °þe®ª
howcome@opera.com                  http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Friday, 19 March 2010 23:31:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:25 GMT