W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2010

Re: [css3-background] vastly different takes on "blur"

From: Brendan Kenny <bckenny@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 13:16:35 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTinxov0rE53e0qPsU1QxdCI0nPjYr1NB7M1q8sHA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
Cc: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "robert@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Brendan Kenny <bckenny@gmail.com> wrote:
> Just to be clear, aren't the mockups for each option going to be the
> same thing? For instance, wouldn't Simon's example
>
> http://smfr.org/misc/shadow.html
>
> just be accompanied by the question
>
> "Would you describe this as 'blur: 8px' or 'blur: 16px'?"
>
> ?

or, as a better example
http://smfr.org/misc/shadow-webkit.png
so browser differences don't confuse things.
Received on Wednesday, 23 June 2010 18:17:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:28 GMT