W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2010

Re: [css3-background] vastly different takes on "blur"

From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 14:14:55 -0700
Message-Id: <936EFFA3-5BE1-43BB-AFE3-8402A5663B0E@gmail.com>
To: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>


On Jun 11, 2010, at 11:13 AM, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote:

> I think shadows are better specified in terms of the steps required  
> to render them, rather than hand-waving descriptions of what things  
> look like.

See, I just don't get this. As an author, I care much more about what  
it looks like than I do about the steps you took in your implentation  
code. 
Received on Friday, 11 June 2010 21:15:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:28 GMT