W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2010

Re: [flex-units] unit abbreviations and the flex()

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 19:53:49 -0700
Message-ID: <4C07193D.3050205@inkedblade.net>
To: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>
CC: www-style@w3.org
On 05/26/2010 08:06 PM, Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:
> Referring to http://www.xanthir.com/:wih document.
>
> I don't think that 'fl' is particularly good name for flex units.
> One of the reasons is that character 'l' is very close to either 'I' or
> '1' in most of fonts in use for development.
>
> I think that something like 1fx is better.

The WG at one point also considered 'fr' for this use case.
I think that may have found its way into some drafts already.
I'm happy with any of the three.

~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 3 June 2010 14:49:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:28 GMT