W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2010

Re: Implementation of Inset Box Shadow on image elements

From: Anton Prowse <prowse@moonhenge.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 22:51:58 +0200
Message-ID: <4C4F46EE.8080008@moonhenge.net>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>, divya manian <divya.manian@gmail.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 12:35 PM, fantasai
> <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
>> As I mentioned, it should be painted immediately below z-index: 1,
>> so that authors can pop things out of the shadow with 'z-index'.
> 
> What would happen if both a parent and a child specified an inset
> shadow?  Which paints on top of which?


> (Presumably the parent's shadow would paint atop the child's shadow.)

That would be a change from the usual approach taken in the stacking
model, where document tree order is king when all else is equal.

Cheers,
Anton Prowse
http://dev.moonhenge.net
Received on Tuesday, 27 July 2010 20:53:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:29 GMT