- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 09:22:21 -0700
- To: Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, Brendan Kenny <bckenny@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Jul 19, 2010, at 3:53 PM, Aryeh Gregor wrote: >> If, on the other hand, I can say, "give me a blur that extends out 40px" by typing '40px' into the appropriate part of the rule, then that is not only intuitive, it is something that the UA can create very precisely with a Gaussian blur or any other kind of blur. > > Then it will look different between different browsers. It already does. Different UAs are making different judgements about how perfect the blur should be at the higher levels. Some are apparently making tradeoffs for the sake of performance, etc. and others may possibly want to take that further with simpler, possibly non-Gaussian blurs. What I was attempting to was set a minimum level of conformance based on the width of the blur region, and on how different the pixel opacity is at the edges of that region from the areas outside the region.
Received on Thursday, 22 July 2010 16:23:00 UTC