W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2010

Re: [css3-background] Where we are with Blur value discussion

From: Alex M <timeroot.alex@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 13:41:03 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTim1oVRAbdaWQSB3jGbPfx9csNqIRAvTZ9KFE6l-@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>, www-style@w3.org
I don't think it the blurs would add linearly, I think they combine more
like (1-(1-opacityA)*(1-opacityA)), which is equivalent to saying their
combined transparency is equal to the product of their individual
transparencies. If, say, the blur's opacity decreased linearly from the
edge, then it the combined opacity would follow a parabola between the two
boxes, being most transparent in the middle.

~6 out of 5 statisticians say that the number of statistics that either make
no sense or use ridiculous timescales at all has dropped over 164% in the
last 5.62474396842 years.

On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>wrote:

> On Jul 17, 2010, at 7:54 AM, Brad Kemper wrote:
> >>On Jul 16, 2010, at 3:30 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com<Simetrical%2Bw3c@gmail.com>>
> wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>> ?_?  That sounds plenty testable to me.  Grab the pixels, verify they
> >>>> form a gradient, then check where the 99% point is hit.  Sounds easy
> >>>> to me.
> >>>
> >>> What algorithm do you propose to "verify they form a gradient"?  Other
> >>> than specifying a canonical type of gradient (say, Gaussian) and just
> >>> comparing against that?
> >>
> >> By "forms a gradient" I mean "creates a monotonic transition from one
> >> color to another".  That's easy to verify by just walking the pixels.
> >
> >More accurately, it is from one _opacity_ (the shadow color's Alpha
> component) to another (transparent). It does look like 'one color to
> another' if it >is a single shadow against a solid-color background, with no
> other elements overlapping it. But that isn't always the case.
>
> Is it also required that the algorithm be symmetric?  Must the rates of
> change be consistent in the X and Y dimensions?
>
> Further, is it required the algorithm be consistent in the positive and
> negative directions.  If I put two boxes next to each other horizontally
> that use the same blur, should they produce a consistent effect on the
> underlying background along the linear part of the shared left/right border
> (because combine they provide a consistent opacity)?
>
> -Brian
>
>
Received on Saturday, 17 July 2010 20:41:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:29 GMT