W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2010

Re: [css3-background] Where we are with Blur value discussion

From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 13:08:48 -0700
Message-Id: <DA1789BE-E0BA-441B-B1E9-6D12C874431E@gmail.com>
Cc: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
To: "robert@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>
On Jul 13, 2010, at 12:55 PM, "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote:

> That's good. But you can't see 3px at 1/1 zoom/resolution?
> 
> No. I'm not sure how you'd expect that to render, anyway. It obviously couldn't be symmetrical on each side of the shadow edge.

Correct, about the symmetry. I said this in the summary at the beginning of this thread:

> 3) A blur width that is an odd number of pixels in total blur width should be possible (with one less pixel on the inside than the outside, say).

Is that not feasible for any reason? It seemed to me like Simon was more positive about being able to do this in webkit, though perhaps I was misinterpreting his answer.  
Received on Tuesday, 13 July 2010 20:10:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:29 GMT