W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2010

Re: A List Apart: Articles: Prefix or Posthack

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 02:37:37 -0700
Message-ID: <4C383F61.4040107@inkedblade.net>
To: Rob Crowther <robertc@boogdesign.com>
CC: www-style@w3.org
On 07/09/2010 09:47 AM, Rob Crowther wrote:
> Richard Fink wrote:
>> Ok, there's a fair case to be made for an expiration. Never say "Never".
>> But why should one release cycle be the trigger? I'm sorry, but that
>> seems
>> kind of arbitrary, if not solipsistic.
>
> If dropping the prefix is to be tied to release cycles, why not make the
> number cycles before dropping it be proportional to the number of
> release cycles during which the prefixed version existed?

This makes sense to me.

~fantasai
Received on Saturday, 10 July 2010 09:38:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:29 GMT