- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 02:37:37 -0700
- To: Rob Crowther <robertc@boogdesign.com>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
On 07/09/2010 09:47 AM, Rob Crowther wrote: > Richard Fink wrote: >> Ok, there's a fair case to be made for an expiration. Never say "Never". >> But why should one release cycle be the trigger? I'm sorry, but that >> seems >> kind of arbitrary, if not solipsistic. > > If dropping the prefix is to be tied to release cycles, why not make the > number cycles before dropping it be proportional to the number of > release cycles during which the prefixed version existed? This makes sense to me. ~fantasai
Received on Saturday, 10 July 2010 09:38:16 UTC