Re: Selecting for features

Adrian Price wrote:
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 5:03 PM, David Woolley 
> <forums@david-woolley.me.uk <mailto:forums@david-woolley.me.uk>> wrote:
> 
>     Adrian Price wrote:
> 
>         I apologize if this is an issue that's been raised before - I
>         was amazed
> 
> 
>     It has; many times.
> 
> That's what I would have thought -- can you point me to any past 
> discussion/decision?
>  
http://www.w3.org/Search/Mail/Public/search?keywords=%22feature+tests%22&hdr-1-name=subject&hdr-1-query=&index-grp=Public_FULL&index-type=t&type-index=www-style

"feature test" singular produces some more, but I haven't checked the 
relevance.

http://www.w3.org/Search/Mail/Public/search?keywords=%22%40supports%22&hdr-1-name=subject&hdr-1-query=&index-grp=Public_FULL&index-type=t&type-index=www-style

produces a lot of relevant hits.

I don't know if "feature queries" produces any not in that last set.



-- 
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.