Re: Issue 158 proposed text

Bruno Fassino wrote:
> 
> It could be a good idea. So you mean simply something like this:
> 
> | If this hypothetical position of the element's top border edge is
> | flush with or past the relevant floats, then no clearance is
> | applied, otherwise clearance is introduced and is set to the greater of:
> | ....
> 
> With the (implicit? or better explicitly stated?) assumption that:
> 
> | In both cases (clearance applied or not applied) the real position of the
> | element is then determined using the collapsing rules at 8.3.1.

Exactly.

Cheers,
Anton Prowse
http://dev.moonhenge.net

Received on Sunday, 4 July 2010 22:24:09 UTC