W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2010

Re: Issue 158 proposed text

From: Anton Prowse <prowse@moonhenge.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2010 00:22:44 +0200
Message-ID: <4C3109B4.7080600@moonhenge.net>
To: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Bruno Fassino wrote:
> 
> It could be a good idea. So you mean simply something like this:
> 
> | If this hypothetical position of the element's top border edge is
> | flush with or past the relevant floats, then no clearance is
> | applied, otherwise clearance is introduced and is set to the greater of:
> | ....
> 
> With the (implicit? or better explicitly stated?) assumption that:
> 
> | In both cases (clearance applied or not applied) the real position of the
> | element is then determined using the collapsing rules at 8.3.1.

Exactly.

Cheers,
Anton Prowse
http://dev.moonhenge.net
Received on Sunday, 4 July 2010 22:24:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:29 GMT