W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2010

Re: [CSS21] Issue 149 - px vs. pt

From: Tantek Celik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 00:24:41 +0000
Message-ID: <10379374-1278030271-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-2032372974-@bda560.bisx.prod.on.blackberry>
To: "Sylvain Galineau" <sylvaing@microsoft.com>,"Stephen Zilles" <szilles@adobe.com>,"www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
Agreed with Sylvain. Not a red herring, nor is linkable documentation.

I still think they (the use-cases) need to be documented somewhere easily searchable/findable/linkable/iteratable (like a wiki page). And no, an email message is insufficient (poor search, linking, zero iteration/history/diffs).

Tantek

-----Original Message-----
From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
Sender: www-style-request@w3.org
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 23:59:09 
To: Stephen Zilles<szilles@adobe.com>; www-style@w3.org list<www-style@w3.org>
Subject: RE: [CSS21] Issue 149 - px vs. pt



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Zilles [mailto:szilles@adobe.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 2:42 PM
> To: Sylvain Galineau; tantek@cs.stanford.edu; David Singer; www-
> style@w3.org list
> Subject: RE: [CSS21] Issue 149 - px vs. pt
> 
> I think the "use case issue" is a red-herring. That is, I think the use
> cases are clear.

I thought so too. But after we agreed to same solution *twice* we are being
told we should go for a different one based on use-cases so it's not so
unreasonable to ask what they really are.


Received on Friday, 2 July 2010 00:25:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:29 GMT