W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2010

Re: [CSSOM] Typos

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:47:24 +0100
To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.u7e8da0764w2qv@annevk-t60>
On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:38:27 +0100, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>  
> On Sunday 2010-01-31 22:33 +0100, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> (Indeed, Gecko implements enableStyleSheetsForSet(). I think this
>> was due to me complaining about the original specification at the
>> time, which was using stylesheet/Stylesheet all over (inconsistently
>> so with document.styleSheets):
>> http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/2005-09-01/#alternate but I
>> cannot find a reference.)
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200930#c98 (comments 98
> through 100) suggest that the case had been fixed in the Web Apps
> 1.0 spec on 2006-06-27, although the reason Gecko implements the
> right case is because we noticed the inconsistency in the code and
> *then* noticed that the spec had been fixed under us.

Ah, right.

> Was what's in the current CSSOM draft forked from the WHATWG spec
> before the material was removed from the WHATWG spec?  If so, are
> there any other useful edits that were missed?

It was forked yes, but as far as I can tell no other edits were missed.  
However, the current version in CSSOM is done in a different style to  
allow easier integration of various other features it defines. When  
rewriting things errors may have been introduced (such as one of the  

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Sunday, 31 January 2010 23:48:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 11 February 2015 12:34:33 UTC