W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2010

Re: [CSSOM] Typos

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:47:24 +0100
To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.u7e8da0764w2qv@annevk-t60>
On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:38:27 +0100, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>  
wrote:
> On Sunday 2010-01-31 22:33 +0100, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> (Indeed, Gecko implements enableStyleSheetsForSet(). I think this
>> was due to me complaining about the original specification at the
>> time, which was using stylesheet/Stylesheet all over (inconsistently
>> so with document.styleSheets):
>> http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/2005-09-01/#alternate but I
>> cannot find a reference.)
>
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200930#c98 (comments 98
> through 100) suggest that the case had been fixed in the Web Apps
> 1.0 spec on 2006-06-27, although the reason Gecko implements the
> right case is because we noticed the inconsistency in the code and
> *then* noticed that the spec had been fixed under us.

Ah, right.


> Was what's in the current CSSOM draft forked from the WHATWG spec
> before the material was removed from the WHATWG spec?  If so, are
> there any other useful edits that were missed?

It was forked yes, but as far as I can tell no other edits were missed.  
However, the current version in CSSOM is done in a different style to  
allow easier integration of various other features it defines. When  
rewriting things errors may have been introduced (such as one of the  
typos).


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Sunday, 31 January 2010 23:48:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:24 GMT