Re: proposal for a new css combinator

On Thursday 2010-01-14 10:59 -0600, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> The Lists module has a note that the WG considered an 'auto' value for
> list-style-type, that would make the UA choose a different value than
> the closest parent, but left the exact choice up to th UA.  It's not
> in the actual spec now, but I agree that the ability to define nested
> lists so that they alternate *somehow* would be useful.

See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2009Jan/0001.html

I believe the group resolved to add this to css3-values at some
point, though it hasn't been added.

-David

-- 
L. David Baron                                 http://dbaron.org/
Mozilla Corporation                       http://www.mozilla.com/

Received on Thursday, 14 January 2010 17:10:41 UTC