W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2010

Re: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients recommended but undefined

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:03:43 -0800
Message-ID: <4B85BE5F.9090400@inkedblade.net>
To: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 02/24/2010 03:59 PM, fantasai wrote:
> On 02/24/2010 03:15 PM, Sylvain Galineau wrote:
>>> From: fantasai [mailto:fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net]
>>
>>
>>> Given that on the 3 February 2010 teleconference you said
>>> Sylvain: I'm ok with 2 or 3
>>
>> Yes, that is what I said. And after further conversations with
>> my peers we agreed that this was not right. Given the number of
>> repetitive messages on this topic between now and then - most of
>> them over the past ~24 hours, between you and I - I didn't expect
>> the need for clarification this far along. My bad.
>
> (If you'd answered my question ~24 hours ago, then maybe there
> would have been fewer repetitive messages.)
>
> Since you've changed your position, let's go back to the question
> before the WG 3 weeks ago.
>
> fantasai: we have 5 options
> 1. Require the sharp transition
> 2. Drop recommendation for gradient, leave transition undefined
> 3. Recommend gradient, define color stops
> 4. Give precise mathematical definition for a gradient that will give
> pixel-perfect copies across implementations
> 5. Drop border-radius
>
> Pick one.

Actually, better yet, pick your favorite and list the ones you
can't live with.

~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 25 February 2010 00:04:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:24 GMT