W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2010

Re: [CSS3] @font vs @background

From: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 21:15:52 -0800
Message-ID: <4B6CFB08.5000601@terrainformatica.com>
To: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
CC: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
Sylvain Galineau wrote:
>> From: Andrew Fedoniouk [mailto:news@terrainformatica.com]
>> Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 7:20 PM
>> To: Sylvain Galineau
>> Cc: www-style
>> Subject: Re: [CSS3] @font vs @background
>> Could you imagine that, say, JavaScript has different precedence rules
>> for ',' operator inside different functions and name of the function
>> will trigger different meaning for ',' operator?
> Well, I don't *need* to imagine it, CSS has been this way for quite some
> time. You imply that this is a problem for people writing CSS parsers
> in JS. That is a small number, afaik. Can you point to evidence that this
> is or has been a problem for them ?

CSS has *not* been this way before. There is no ' '/',' mess in CSS21 AFAIR.

When you see a bug what kind of evidence/metrics you need?
Number of WTFs per minute coming from parser designers, JS and CSS 
authors or what?

It *is* a bug. As any bug it could be fixed or left as it is - declared 
as such a feature. It is up to us - to the personal flexibility
of "engineering conscience". Sorry for the pathetic tone but I really
do not understand what you are trying to say.

Andrew Fedoniouk.

Received on Saturday, 6 February 2010 05:16:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:32 UTC