Re: Feedback on Image modules

Le 17 déc. 2010 à 12:57, Anne van Kesteren a écrit :
> I'm also not really convinced this functionality is needed. In practice user agents will have to support the same image formats and similar fallback scenarios have never worked out. (E.g. <object> was a complete failure.) I don't think we should add this.
@font-face seems like a successful fallback scenario. Right now, you can embed EOT, OTF/TTF, SVG, WOFF and rely on the fallback mechanism to let browsers only download the first format supported.

Same goes with <video> and <audio>

Received on Friday, 17 December 2010 14:02:14 UTC