W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2010

Re: [CSS21] accepted/recommended forms of Subject for WD comments

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 00:49:54 -0800
Message-ID: <4D072FB2.1090801@inkedblade.net>
To: www-style@gtalbot.org
CC: Peter Moulder <peter.moulder@monash.edu>, W3C style mailing list <www-style@w3.org>
On 12/12/2010 12:18 PM, "Gérard Talbot" wrote:
>
>> I see that both this announcement ("[CS21]") and some of the first
>> comments sent ("[CSS 2.1]") use a different tag.
>
> Peter,
>
> I have used
>
> [CSS 2.1] WD 07 Dec. 2010: section x.y.z Subject description
>
> Another idea:
> [CSS 2.1] 20101207: section x.y.z Subject description
>
> or
>
> [CSS 2.1 WD 20101207]: section x.y.z Subject description
>
> I think there should be a blank white space between "CSS" and "2.1" but
> there is no consensus on this. Using square brackets should be encouraged.

The recommended format is [CSS21]. I believe Bert's [CS21] tag is a typo. :)

See http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/#status Every spec says what tag to use.

~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 14 December 2010 08:50:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:35 GMT