W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2010

Re: background-transform (Was: Re: [css3-images] Repeating oblique gradients)

From: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 10:12:12 -0800
Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Leif Arne Storset <lstorset@opera.com>, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Message-id: <D92178F0-2023-4E43-A8E6-4CC65354DC63@me.com>
To: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@adobe.com>
On Dec 2, 2010, at 9:53 AM, Rik Cabanier wrote:

> The transform would be applied to the content after the other background properties. It is additive to the existing implementation.
> In case of a repeating image scaled at 50% and rotated, the browser would scale the image, tile it and then apply the transform on the whole bitmap. (Internally the browser could optimize these steps)

But the tiled image would effectively have infinite extent, so the entire background area is covered by rotated, tiled images, right?

> I was thinking that background-origin would work to define the transformation point, but I'm not so sure..

Yes, I was thinking we probably need background-transform-origin too.

Received on Thursday, 2 December 2010 18:12:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:41 UTC