On Dec 1, 2010, at 4:18 PM, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote: > > My opinion is that background-repeat should only ever cause tiling to happen. It should not do magic things with gradients, like behave as if the color-stops were duplicated. In my view, the magic is in Tabs version, in which a keyword behave as if the author duplicated the color-stops infinitely. What I'm suggesting is that background-repeat DOES cause tiling to happen, but that the degrees in the linear gradient are applied to the backgound layer plane instead of to each image individually. > I think I agree with Tab here, but I'm not able to follow this whole conversation.Received on Thursday, 2 December 2010 01:01:59 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:34 GMT