W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2010

Re: [css-ruby] Proposal to publish new WD

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 19:23:41 +0100
To: www-style@w3.org, "Richard Ishida" <ishida@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.vm1r1rxy64w2qv@anne-van-kesterens-macbook-pro.local>
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 18:30:24 +0100, Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org> wrote:
> I'd like to publish the version of the CSS3 Ruby Module at  
> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-ruby/ as a new WD.  This will take the ruby  
> module out of CR and revert it to a Working Draft.
> Before publishing I'd like to apply all change marks in the editor's  
> version of the document, *with the exception of* those in Section 4.1,  
> so I'd like the Working Group to comment on whether those proposed  
> changes are controversial.  They are essentially editorial in nature,  
> but note, in particular, that I have replaced most references to JIS  
> X-4051 with references to Requirements for Japanese Text Layout  
> (http://www.w3.org/TR/jlreq/).
> I expect all editorial notes and change marks in section 4.1 to remain.
> I'd like to ask the Working Group to take a decision to publish the new  
> version.

Since most user agents are now implementing HTML5. Shouldn't we align the  
Ruby Module with that? The editorial changes are probably an improvement,  
but the draft still does not really reflect the status quo. E.g. sequences  
of ruby text / ruby base are not covered.

Having said that, taking it out of CR makes sense.

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Wednesday, 1 December 2010 18:24:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:41 UTC