Re: [css-style-attr] SVG WG comments on CSS Styling Attributes Level 1

On 24/8/10 8:41, Chris Lilley wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 23, 2010, 4:29:20 AM, fantasai wrote:
> 
> f> On 02/09/2010 03:26 PM, Chris Lilley wrote:
> 
>>> 2) In section 3. Syntax and Parsing, the text "Note that following the
>>> CSS2.1 convention, comment tokens are not shown in the rule above." is
>>> given as an informative note, but appears to be normative. It states,
>>> in effect, that the normative grammar given is incomplete. Please make
>>> this statement normative.
> 
> f> It's a note because the sentence above says "is given below in terms of
> f> the CSS core grammar". I've clarified that to "terms and conventions".
> f> Please let me know if this addresses your comment.
> 
> Thank you, the new wording addresses that comment.
> 
>>> 3) In section 3. Syntax and Parsing, the actual grammar for a style
>>> attribute, following CSS2.1 chapter 4, appears to be
> 
>>> declaration-list
>>>    : C* S* C* declaration? C* [ ';' C* S* C* declaration? C*]* C*
>>>    ;
> 
>>> where C is the comment production. Is that correct? (Specifically, are
>>> leading and trailing comments allowed, as well as ones between tokens?)
> 
> f> I'll leave this question to Bert, who's our resident grammar expert.
> 
> I haven't found any response from Bert on this.

Zack is at least as much of a grammar expert as me. :-) In other words,
I agree with his response.



Bert
-- 
  Bert Bos                                ( W 3 C ) http://www.w3.org/
  http://www.w3.org/people/bos                               W3C/ERCIM
  bert@w3.org                             2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93
  +33 (0)4 92 38 76 92            06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France

Received on Friday, 27 August 2010 13:44:06 UTC