- From: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 13:56:57 +1000
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Alan Gresley wrote: > Gecko it seems has a problem when something is not present for the html > element or an anonymous html element. In the linked series of test cases > below, this is not giving html a background-color. Also this has > something to do with it being HTML5. XML (traditional at least) does not > show this problem. > > > <http://css-class.com/test/temp/root-bfc-icb1.htm> Correction. The IMG changes position in all implementations (tested in Gecko, WebKit, Opera and IE8) if a background-color is declared for HTML. 1. With no HTML background-color - The IMG bottom edge sits up against the bottom-padding-edge of HTML. 2. With no HTML background-color - The IMG bottom edge sits up against the bottom-padding-edge of the block-level in normal flow. Since the spec doesn't say anything of the positioning of background-image if the background-color is present on the HTML (root element) or not, then all implementations are doing something which I do not understand. -- Alan http://css-class.com/ Armies Cannot Stop An Idea Whose Time Has Come. - Victor Hugo
Received on Friday, 27 August 2010 03:57:28 UTC