W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2009

Re: image-fit and image-position renamed?

From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:38:15 -0700
Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, www-style@w3.org
Message-Id: <BB8F10C7-577C-4EB2-8D41-82AEEFB476B1@gmail.com>
To: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>

On Sep 22, 2009, at 8:14 AM, Håkon Wium Lie wrote:

> I suggest that we either (1) stick to the current "image" names but
> specify that this can apply to <video> as well, or that we (2) rename
> these to 'content-fit' and 'content-position'.
>
> My preference would be (2).

Of those two choices, I prefer the first. Video is a series of images,  
so it is not that hard to think of 'image-*' as something that would  
apply to video too. But "content" implies so much more (such as  
including text), and so I don't think that name is as clear.
Received on Tuesday, 22 September 2009 17:38:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:21 GMT