W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2009

Re: [css3-selectors] New last call WD for Selectors

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 17:41:50 -0700
Message-ID: <4AE24D4E.7040201@inkedblade.net>
To: Anton Prowse <prowse@moonhenge.net>
CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Anton Prowse wrote:
> Congratulations on a very solid-looking specification!
> 
> Here are the things that I noticed when reading through the document.
> (Trivial editorial issues are listed separately at the end.)
> 
> ...
> 
> 6.6.5. Structural pseudo-classes
> (http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-css3-selectors-20090310/#structural-pseudos) 
> :
> 
>   # Standalone pieces of PCDATA (text nodes in the DOM) and other
>   # non-element nodes are not counted when calculating the position of
>   # an element in the list of children of its parent.
> 
> Issue 4:  Neither "PCDATA" nor "DOM" are defined in this document.
> "PCDATA" is not used anywhere else in the document, and "DOM" is only
> used once more in normative text, in the subsection ':empty
> pseudo-class' of this section.
> 
> ...
> 
> 6.6.5 :empty pseudo-class
> (http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-css3-selectors-20090310/#empty-pseudo) :
> 
>   # The :empty pseudo-class represents an element that has no children
>   # at all. In terms of the DOM, only element nodes and text nodes
>   # (including CDATA nodes and entity references) whose data has a
>   # non-zero length must be considered as affecting emptiness; comments,
>   # PIs, and other nodes must not affect whether an element is
>   # considered empty or not.
> 
> Issue 6:  Neither "DOM", "CDATA" nor "PI" are defined in this document.
> Neither "CDATA" nor "PI" is used anywhere else in the document, and
> "DOM" is only used once more in normative text, in the introduction to
> this section.

I've attempted to handle these by altering the wording and adding an
informative reference to DOM3 Core:
   http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/csswg/selectors3/Overview.html.diff?r1=1.60&r2=1.61&f=h

Please let me know if this addresses your comment.

~fantasai
Received on Saturday, 24 October 2009 00:42:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:21 GMT